|
Source: Tinua Watershd Project, Palpa (quoted in Kasojoo, 1988 and Jackso, 1987. All values rounded to nearst integer.Several plots were selected in narrow valley (Map 1) in order to test planting techniques under different growing conditions. Plots A (Map 2) and B (Map 3) are new landslide areas of differing soil qualities. Plots C (Map 4) and D (Map 5) are terraced slopes, wet and dry respectively. Plot E (Map 6) is a dry hill slope and Plot F (Map 7) is located on the banks of the streams at the bottom of the valley. The following species were tested: Dhanu; Ghopi; Laurei; Leiwai; Tama Kalo; Tama Seto and Taru. 2.2 Field Study MethodSurveys of the experiment were carried out after six months and one year. The growth of every plant was measured and a distinction drawn between the growth of 'shoots' (arising from new underground rhizomes) and 'nodes' (which grow from the stems of the original cuttings). The number of shoots and nodes was recorded, together with their maximum and minimum lengths, rounded up to the nearest 5 cm. In the second survey only a record of survival was made. 2.3 Data Analysis MethodThe results were entered into a computer and general trends noted. No statistical analysis of the results was carried out because there were too few replications of each experiment for this to be possible. 3. RESULTS AND DISCUSSIONTable 2 (below) shows the results obtained from the trials. Appendix 2 lists the processed data for each species. Table 2: Summarisesd Results
From Tables 10, 11 & 14: Appendix 2.Due to the lack of sufficient replications it was decided to present results by species rather than for each trial plot. Greater than 50 percent survival was considered a "success", less than 50 percent a "failure". Of the seven species tested Dhanu bans, Tam a Kalo, Tama Seto and Taru bans were found to grow successfully from stem cuttings. At present it appears that double node cuttings are more viable than sigle node, Further trials were started in February 1989 to determine if there is a significant difference between the two methods. Taru bans proved to be the most successful species tested, consistently giving 100 percent success from cuttings, but propagated poorly from rhizomes. Of the other three species tested Ghopi and Leiwa are of small diameter and therefore probably do not have sufficient food reserves to be grown efficiently from cuttings. They also grew poorly from rhizomes. Their future usefulness is therefore doubtful. Laurei bans does not produce large side branches and is also of small diameter (less than 3 cm). As it is also a speading species it is worthy of being planted on a wider scale because speading species are more effective at soil stabilisation when compared to species that form a dense clump. Plot B was altered between the two surveys and so no data from this site was considered in the results and conclusions. The results for Plot E were interesting (see Table 13, Appendix 2). Five 'short' Dhanu bans rhizomes (with a culm of less than 30 cm) produced a total of 14 new shoots in the first six months of growth, while 6 'long' Dhanu bans rhizomes only produced 4 shoots between them. (The fact that one of the short rhizomes died is probably not significant). From the success of Dhanu bans in this trial we can infere that:
4. CONCLUSIONS.Dhanu bans is best grown from cuttings [Rhizomes are also successful]. Ghopi bans propagates poorly by any method. Laurei bans is very successful from rhizomes and is worthy of use on a wider scale. Leiwa bans propagates poorly by any method. Tama Kalo can be grown from cuttings [rhizomes less successful]. Tama Seto can be grown from cuttings [rhizomes less successful]. Taru bans cuttings are far superior to rhizomes [usually the most successful species from cuttings]. Rhizomes with short culm will be more successful on sites where grazing is prohibited. REFERENCESJackson, J.K. (1987). Manual of Afforestation in Nepal. Kathmandu, Nepal: U.K. Forestry Project, Forest Survey and Research Office, Dept. of Forest, 59. Kasojoo, V.K. (1988). Palpa As You Like It. Nepal: Kumar Press APPENDIX |